Ken Kamp’s signs at his Good Nature Farms farmstand on US 31 say Always fresh-always ours. A sound motto. I subscribe to it. It could be the motto for Torch Lake Views, but Ken got there first.
I am musing on this because former Detroit Free Press columnist Harry Cook, in the course of a talk on the subject of the death of newspapers, disparaged The Blogger in no uncertain terms. According to John Tarrant, the publisher of the Antrim Review, the exact phrase was “an idiot sitting in his underwear in his basement blogging.” (While I was working on this post Louan Lechler dropped by and commented that it should have been “in his mother’s basement.”) My ego reeled from the blow. Then I thought better of it. At least what’s here is Always Fresh and Always Mine.
When I lived in Detroit and the Free Press was the flagship of the proud Knight-Ridder empire, I read Cook’s columns with pleasure. I read Remer Tyson’s reporting from Africa, too, and Jim Fitzgerald’s columns about Lum, and Mitch Albom’s sportswriting, and the musings of Judd Arnett, my neighbor in Grandmont. I pretty much read the Free Press–and the Detroit News, they were different then–all the way through every day.
But that was then and this is now. The newspapers I loved are shadows of their former selves, and it has been a long, long time since enterprise journalism was the norm there. “It’s just too expensive,” publishers say. “Print can’t compete with the internet.” In my view, it wasn’t the internet that put newspapers in their current predicament. The decline began with the advent of USA Today–television in print–and with the shift from Walter Cronkite to Entertainment Tonight on the tube, and the shift from J.P. McCarthy on WJR to rant radio all around the dial. Newspapers chased the lowest common denominator, focusing on celebrity over substance, haring after the weird rather than the significant, filling space with generic AP stories rather than solid in-house reporting. People could read endlessly about the exploits of some “entertainer” but search in vain for a helpful story on what the heck the local school board was up to. So was that the newspapers’ fault or our own? Did they misread us, or did we stop reading them in favor of junkfood for the mind?
If good newspapers die, we will all be the poorer for it. Meanwhile there are plenty of laid-off reporters and editors who are trying to figure out how to make a living in the new online environment. There are trivial blogs, just as there have always been trivial newspaper stories and silly magazines. There are also wonderful blogs about real news, real people, real places. A lot of us are writing online columns rather than hard news, but we take them seriously and work hard on them. Blogs offer self-serve stories. You pays your time (and your ISP) and you takes your choice.
So here I am, sitting in my underwear–pajamas really, the kind that can, in a pinch, be worn to walk the dogs of a morning. And the basement part, well, that’s wrong too. The Writing Studio & Bait Shop is on a crawlspace, and it’s much nicer to sit at the desk and look out at the wooded drumlins and ponder what to write next. It takes a long time, as I am an idiot. So, um, that’s two items out of three that Cook got wrong. Maybe dinner speakers should have editors, too . . . or at least fact-checkers.
I agree with Cook that the fundamental weakness of the blogosphere is that–right now–there are few trustworthy arbiters of ethics, accuracy, taste. Bloggers do not have editors. It is not much like the journalism I grew up with. Or maybe it’s exactly like the journalism I grew up with, ranging from excellent to appalling, challenging to absurd. It is the reader’s responsibility to read critically, to decide how much credence to give any story in any medium. Test, weigh, compare with other sources and with our own life experience.
The people I write about know me and know where I live and where I work at my day job and where I work at my other day job. They do not hesitate to tell me when I have gotten it wrong. I care about them and about all of us as a community and while I often write in what I consider to be a humorous vein, I take my responsibility to them–to us–very seriously.
End of rant. Tomorrow, another Photo by Babs, another odd corner of Antrim County explored, another weed, another tale about Miss Sadie and the Cowboy. Who knows? But you can bet your underwear it won’t be a rewarmed story from a national syndicate. Instead, it will tell you some little something about who we are at this moment in history in this little Township in northern Michigan–with the occasional little daytrip . . .
dmarks
July 25, 2009
Bob Talbert. Remember him?
Gerry
July 25, 2009
Oh, yes! He could be very funny. And he loved wandering about northern Michigan finding good things to eat. I can relate.
uphilldowndale
July 26, 2009
‘It is the reader’s responsibility to read critically, to decide how much credence to give any story in any medium. Test, weigh, compare with other sources and with our own life experience.’
I’ve had this debate with the ‘anti-blog’ lobby too. The media under pressure is a snappy and vindictive, however I don’t think blogging is the root of it’s demise.
Gerry
July 26, 2009
I flashed on an image of yappy little dogs snapping at your bright red wellies as you proceed serenely through the countryside, camera at hand . . .
Blogging isn’t killing newspapers. Now those idiotic forwards that people persist in emailing to their friends and relations, those are killing off brain cells at an alarming rate, and surely contribute to a decline in reading real news.
flandrumhill
July 26, 2009
Gerry I love the way your writing confirms what I already know to be true while also enlightening me by introducing other angles.
As the daughter of a newspaperman, I grew up reading everything that didn’t move and learned to love spelling, editing, fonts and typewriters. There was always the latest edition and contact sheets for the next on the kitchen table and boxes and boxes of film in the freezer. By 15, I was already a published author and illustrator when most of my peers were struggling to get their next essay written for English class.
From my dad I learned the importance of advertisers and that you should never believe everything you read.
One of my sisters insists that printing ink runs through our veins instead of blood. I wonder if 1s and 0s run through bloggers’ veins as well.
I’ve always believed that it was a privilege to see your words in print and with that came a responsibility to deliver quality and something of relevance to readers. Blogging exists, not because it can, but because it’s providing something of value that’s not being delivered in hard copy these days.
(Sorry to ramble so long).
Gerry
July 26, 2009
You ramble to good effect, Amy. Thank you for the kind words. The real test will come when something I write challenges what you know to be true–and you challenge me right back. That’s when I learn the most.
Louan Lechler
July 27, 2009
Now Gerry, you know, I didn’t mean that you were in your mother’s basement, and I love the idea of working in one’s robe and slippers. I consider your creation a cut above the blah blah blogs, of the type, that pull down all tastefull and informative news venues.
I had my own moment, this week. I found myself feeling the surface of an Elk Rapids Harbor Days poster. Could it be? Yes, it was printed with wood type. See how bad printers are. We are not just disturbed over the loss of good writing, but the loss of good printing, the smell of it, and the feel of it.
Gerry
July 27, 2009
I knew what you meant–Harry Cook could have been even funnier than he was! And, um, I was kidding about my ego. It reeleth not.
I love the smell of printers ink, too, and I’ve never met a printer I didn’t like. I’ll have to go inspect some Harbor Days posters. (People already wonder what the heck I’m doing knee-deep in weeds by the side of the road, tiny camera plastered to my face. Just wait till they see me pawing posters. My reputation for eccentricity grows daily.)